Crafting Compliance for financial institutions

Regtech

Role

As the lead and sole designer, I drove all design initiatives across the company:

  • End-to-end ownership of design processes

  • Building a foundation design system

  • Managing freelance designers and marketing agency

  • Collaborating with Product department on research and strategy

Intro

Cense provides advanced compliance solutions for managing risks associated with digital assets and cryptocurrencies. The platform helps financial institutions meet global AML and CFT regulations through transparent and comprehensive reporting, while simplifying compliance workflows through automated risk assessments and client profiling.


Cense’s Solution consists of three core products:

  • Client Connect Portal for end-user wallet connections

  • Institution Management Admin Panel for compliance teams

  • Forensic Intelligence Reports for risk analysis and assessment

Key Projects

Connect Portal

Admin Panel

Risk Analysis Report

Cense

Connect Portal

Business Scope

Cense needed a reliable and user-friendly way for end users to import their cryptocurrency assets into the platform, ensuring accuracy and ease of use across various wallets and exchanges.

Project Goal

Create a seamless crypto asset import process that minimizes user errors, reduces friction, and enhances overall user satisfaction.

Research Methods

Competitor Analysis

Since Cense lacks direct competitors, the research focused on crypto tax platforms with similar import interfaces, such as Cryptotaxcalculator, Koinly, and Accointing.

Stakeholders Workshop

This session shaped facilitated the development of initial assumptions, serving as a foundation for mockups, to be refined or validated through user research.

User Interviews &
Usability Testings

Two rounds were conducted with 24 testers of varying crypto expertise, using prototypes designed from theoretical assumptions.

6
Flows Analysis

9
Stakeholders

24
Testers

Key Research Findings

90% of users

successfully completed the connect process.

65% of users

expressed data sharing & security concerns.

70% of users

preferred starting support process with chatbot.

Major Insights

User Security & Trust (75% of users)

  • Strong preference for transparent data handling

  • High concern about sharing crypto data

  • Need for explicit purpose communication

  • Platform bank association increases trust

Import Process Success (83% of users)

  • Three-step process reduced user anxiety

  • Clear error messaging appreciated

  • Multiple connection options well-received

  • Visual progress indicators helped orientation

Critical Pain Points

  • Terms confusion ("Provider", "Web3Connect")

  • Verification status clarity

  • Hardware wallet accessibility

  • API key sharing hesitation

Key Improvements Implemented

Enhanced User Guidance

  • Added detailed API key location instructions

  • Improved Binance manual import explanation

  • Restructured provider search prioritization

  • Updated technical terminology

UI Refinements

  • Reintroduced step indicators

  • Repositioned instruction placement

  • Transformed wallet display (list to boxes)

  • Added confirmation modals

Trust Building

  • Enhanced privacy policy visibility

  • Added data usage explanations

  • Improved bank relationship clarity

  • Clear post-submission process

Solution

Three-step connection process

  • Connect: Multiple wallet connection options

  • Verify: Proof of ownership verification

  • Submit: Final compliance submission

Tailored flows for

  • Automatic connections (MetaMask, Coinbase)

  • Exchange connections (including Binance's partial data import)

  • Hardware wallets

  • Manual connections

  • Unsupported providers

Cense

Admin Panel

Project Scope

Compliance officers needed a comprehensive view to monitor and manage their clients' crypto asset assessments, track report statuses, and streamline their workflow in accordance with regulatory requirements.

Research Methods

User Interviews

Together with compliance officers of varying crypto expertise, we shaped expectations to build the platform's iterations and assumptions.

Journey Mapping

Helped identify key touchpoints, pain points, and opportunities in their current workflow, focusing on how they manage multiple client assessments and reports.

Usability Testings

Testing rounds were conducted with compliance officers from different financial institutions, using interactive prototypes to validate our assumptions and refine the interface.

Journey Mapping

Task Analysis: Actions & Errors State Journey

Key Research Findings

Major Insights

Client Status Tracking

  • Detailed invitation status tracking is critical for managing follow-ups and reducing communication gaps through:
    - Email interaction monitoring
    - Account creation progress
    - Last activity timestamps

Report Management

  • Desire to track historical report submissions

  • Need for filtering by date and status

  • Ability to re-run reports for newer data analysis

  • Option to export data for reporting to superiors

  • Capability to redirect clients back to platform post-report generation

Transparency on Error Handling

  • Clear error status differentiation

  • Continuous status updates, even during investigation.

User-Specific Requirements

  • Internal reference; custom client ID integration

  • Deleted client history retention

Key Improvements Implemented

Improved Error Communication

Specified error types and resolution status
Implemented direct access to email Cense's team
Added transparency updates during investigation

Enhanced Status Tracking

Added detailed information of past interactions and their nature
Integrated new filters for easy tracking
Created one-table dashboard with tailored action views

Streamlined Report Management

Integrated advanced filtering and search options
Created quick access to essential functions
Implemented comprehensive status overview

Solution

One Table Dashboard

  • Centralized view for all client activities and statuses

  • Tailored action buttons based on client's current state

  • Quick access to essential functions

  • Integrated client ID for internal reference

Advanced Filtering System

  • Multi-parameter search capabilities

  • Status-based filtering (email interaction, account creation)

  • Date range selection for historical tracking

  • Error state filtering (minor/major issues)

Error Management Interface

  • Direct support email generation

  • Real-time status updates

  • Transparent investigation progress

Report Handling

  • Historical submission tracking

  • One-click report re-run option

  • Client redirection for data updates

  • Export functionality for team sharing

Cense

Risk Analysis Report

Research Methods

User Interviews

Working with compliance officers at different stages of the report development and new features integrations helped shape our understanding of risk data interpretation, crucial decision-making information, and effective ways to share findings across different team members.

Task Analysis

Through systematic mapping of compliance officers' report review process, we identified crucial decision points and required information hierarchy.

Solution

We built a comprehensive risk report data display & structure encompassing:



  1. Overview

    • Source of Funds

    • Source of Wealth

    • Proof of Wallet Ownership

  2. Source of Funds

    • Counterparty analysis

    • Top 20 Counterparties

    • High Risk Transactions

  3. Source of Wealth

    • Holdings per wallet

    • Privacy Coins

  4. Wallets insights

    • Summary per Wallet

    • Transactions Summary per Wallet

    • holdings per Wallet

  5. Undeclared Wallets Indication

General Metrics & Outcomes

  • Enabling financial institutions to efficiently onboard millions in crypto-related funds from clients

  • Processing 500+ wallets and exchanges for institutional clients

  • Enabled RIEC (Regional Information and Expertise Centers) Netherland law enforcement to successfully conclude multiple investigations

  • Considerably reduce investigation time through automated data collection by a minimum of 50% (% varies per case & Institution) 



*Exact numbers are subject to confidentiality agreements and cannot be disclosed.

Select this text to see the highlight effect